The first impression when writing this post is: are there enough nice words to describe a little child?
And then as an amateur photographer, is there anything better than seeing such a little angel with the sun and the wind in her hair in that position through your lens?
Thanks to 2008 technology you can buy a decent digital camera which is nice because you can take digital photos and then you are able to retouch them with a special software. But then, I often ask myself, how real these digital photos are? How much credit goes to the artistic eye? How much goes to the photo editing software?
I think a photo needs to be original. Now you may think I'm a bit retro, but in the oldern days you only had nice photos if the photographer knew what he was doing. In this respect a photo which comes directly from your sensor is more original, hence more attractive than anything you retouch (more or less heavily).
This one hasn't been touched. I could call it a snapshot anytime and I consider that the photo talks for itself. No more words needed here!
A little angel is always better than any pain killer and better than any clown. In no more than 5 minutes you won't feel any pain and you'll have a huge smile on your face!